We want to invite you to take a look at our site so that you will be better informed about the subject of euthanasia, also known as assisted suicide. Some of what you are about to read may seem unbelievable, far-fetched, or even lies. Let us reassure you that you can verify everything on this site by taking the time to read, consider and ask us or others to explain or justify the information laid out here for you. We want to protect you and those you love, literally from a fate worse than death. The events recalled here have been documented, studied, and laid down in our history.
People who think this way of dying is good prefer to call such a death assisted dying. (LINK names used) This is designed to make it seem palatable; a good choice, your choice, one that you shouldn’t be deprived of. Most of us are afraid of death, of course, we are afraid, dying is the great unknown,
‘Undiscovered country from whose bourn No traveller returns.’
If you are reading this and are worried about a loved one, a friend or someone whose care you feel concerned about first will you please take a look at DHYDRATION LIFELINE.
This information has been compiled by a group of eminently qualified medics with many years of experience. You can trust their advice and opinions and their courage in speaking out. Their aim is to stop people dying unnecessarily and in great pain brought on by lack fluids or food. They also tell us very clearly, ‘There is no evidence that a “dying process” exists or that it can be diagnosed.’
To offer what looks like a quick fix is very alluring. To paint a scary picture is to play on our worst fears. We implore you not to fall for what is emotional blackmail.
DON’T VOTE FOR WHAT YOU DON’T KNOW
We want to tell you the ‘whole story’ about euthanasia so that you can be much better informed. On this site you can read facts and figures and real life attitudes and events that people who are campaigning for euthanasia to be made legal will not tell you.
People who work for and support DIGNITY IN DYING and other organisations that push the idea would rather that you remain ignorant to the problems faced in: every district, every town and every country where it is now legal in. These deaths can only be one thing and that is suicide, not assisted dying. They will insist that the people who die are in the very last stages of their life – we will tell you why in many cases this is just not true.
The idea of assisted suicide is being hyped as ‘a human right’ that you have a
right to die at the time of your choosing. We believe that you also have the right to know the truth about what is happening now, where assisted suicide is legal.
TANYA DAVISON presents a clear and persuasive argument regarding the ‘rights’ and misconceptions surrounding euthanasia. She articulates a secular and engaging perspective.
Medical advancement empowers us to preserve and prolong our lives well beyond what was once possible. With these miracles of science, however, the Western world has become fearful that our once-flourishing lives are fated to drag on, and end in debility, dependence, and disgrace.
This fear has given rise to the popularity of assisted suicide, and a phrase now all so familiar: ‘a right to die’, but does such a right really exist?
It is generally thought that humans have a right to self-determination, liberty, and to life itself. One would be forgiven, therefore, for making the following assumption: ‘If I have a right to self-determination, I have a right to determine my own death.’ Or ‘If I have a right to life, I should be free to give that life up.’ However, this line of thinking is fraught with problems.
The ‘right to life’ is expressed in simple language so that everyone can understand it. Accuracy is put aside for rhetorical impact. We say: ‘All people have a right to life’, but what we mean is ‘All people have a right to go about their lives unharmed by others, so long as they are not harming anyone else.’ The second one is more accurate, but this first one is punchier. On closer inspection then, ‘the right to life’ is completely incompatible with assisted suicide, because we’re all obliged to not cause each other harm—basically to not kill one another.
The pro-‘right to die’ camp might interject here and ask: if the right to life is in place to minimise harm, what about the harm caused to people at the end of their lives, struggling in agony and indignity? This leads us nicely to a more fundamental problem with ‘right to die’.
Rights are for the living, not the dead. They exist to minimise harm, yes, but also to protect people, and give them their best shot at a good life. Is death ever the best shot at a good life? How can it be? Isn’t this an oxymoron?
The ‘right to die’ shares no philosophical relationships to the ‘right to life’. They are not two sides of the same coin, but opposites that do not attract. In fact, ‘right to die’ has less in common with ‘right to live’ (a philosophy that assumes human life is inherently valuable), than it does with nihilism. It imagines that the only life worth living is a life free of alignment. If we really want to build on the philosophy of ‘right to life’, we should do so by insisting that the dependent have just as much dignity as anyone else. That even if you’re dying, you have a right to live your life, until you die.
Kim Leadbeater says she is ‘absolutely confident’ that postponement will not delay legislation reaching royal assent
The next vote on legislation to introduce assisted dying in England and Wales has been delayed by three weeks to give MPs on all sides more time to consider its changes, the MP leading the issue has said.
The Guardian 8/4/25
The law in the UK prohibits people from assisting the suicide of others, though prosecutions are incredibly rare, ITV News UK Editor Paul Brand reports
A man has been arrested in the UK on suspicion of encouraging or assisting the suicide of a British person in Switzerland, with police potentially investigating dozens more deaths.
There needs to be a wider discussion around the issue of assisted dying in Northern Ireland, according to the newly-appointed Commissioner for Older People.
After nine weeks of scrutiny and 150 amendments, there are still huge unknowns over legislation for England and Wales
When the assisted dying bill returns to the Commons in a month’s time, MPs will vote on a very different piece of legislation than they were presented with on the first reading.
Though the government is still technically neutral, major changes ........
Nikki Kenward, mum , Director of Distant Voices etc etc
Find out about the Distant Voices here
Silent Witness actress (Liz Carr) is concerned about how this could affect vulnerable or disabled people. These fears are central to her new documentary Better Off Dead?, in which she makes the case against assisted dying in the UK.
Carr is afraid that changing the law for terminally ill people could eventually result in those who are poor, disabled or mentally ill being allowed to have an assisted death in the UK - or even feeling compelled to do so.
Nikki Kenward, campaign director of The Distant Voices, a user-led campaign group which opposes euthanasia and assisted suicide, told DNS she was “very concerned” at the momentum behind legalisation and now believed it would happen.
She said safeguards had failed in prisons, schools, children’s homes and within the police, so there was no reason why any safeguards would work with assisted suicide laws.
....under Oregon's assisted death law, one can achieve the status of being "incurably" sick even if the disease can be treated! Diseases that, without treatment, are expected to lead to death within six months are considered to be incurable and so qualify for assisted death.
A more in-depth look at the terminology of assisted dying, euthanasia and PAS can be found below - Slippery Slope
There is debate over what the different terms mean.......
But assisted dying is generally used to describe a situation where someone who is terminally ill seeks medical help to obtain lethal drugs which they administer themselves.
Assisted suicide is intentionally helping another person to end their life. It can involve people who are not terminally ill.
Providing someone with a lethal dose of sedatives, or helping them go to Switzerland (where assisted suicide is legal), could both be considered assisted suicide.
Euthanasia is the act of deliberately ending a person's life to relieve suffering, in which a lethal drug is administered by a physician.
It is legal in fewer places than assisted dying or assisted suicide, and patients do not necessarily have to be terminal.
There are two types: voluntary euthanasia, where a patient has given consent, and non-voluntary, where they have not been able to, for example if they are in a coma.
More specifically, euthanasia is illegal under English law and is considered manslaughter or murder. The maximum penalty is life imprisonment.
The Suicide Act 1961 also makes it illegal to encourage or assist a suicide in England and Wales. Those found guilty could face up to 14 years in prison.
Similar laws also exist in Northern Island.
There is no specific crime of assisting a suicide in Scotland, but it is possible that helping a person to die could lead to prosecution for culpable homicide.
However, a new bill drafted by the Lib Dem MSP Liam McArthur, could see Scotland become the first UK nation to allow assisted suicide.
Mr McArthur expects the bill to be debated in the Scottish Parliament in the autumn.
In March 2024, a report from the Health and Social Care Committee highlighted confusion over the rules governing UK doctors providing medical evidence for people who wanted to go abroad to die.
The British Medical Association (BMA) advises doctors against producing medical reports to facilitate assisted suicide abroad.
UK membership of Dignitas, the Swiss assisted dying association, jumped to 1,900 people in 2023, according to the organisation. That is a 24% rise on the previous year.
It said 40 people from the UK ended their lives at Dignitas in 2023, the highest level since 2019. In total, it has helped 571 Britons die since 1998.
Campaigners have made numerous attempts to alter the law over many years.
Broadcaster Dame Esther Rantzen, who has stage four lung cancer,launched a petition in support of Assited dying in December 2023. It has passed the 100,000-signature threshold needed to trigger a debate in Parliament.
Dame Esther, who has joined Dignitas, welcomed the Health and Social Care Committee's findings that end-of-life care had improved in some places which had legalised assisted dying.
However, she said she was "disappointed" that it had not backed her calls for a vote.
Dame Esther Rantzen, who has stage four lung cancer, says she has joined Dignitas in Switzerland
The Westminster government says any change is a matter for Parliament.
Proposals on assisted dying were last rejected in July 2022, but the government said it would provide time to debate the subject again. It indicated that MPs would be free to vote as they wished.
Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer says that he is "personally in favour of changing the law" on assisted dying, and is "committed" to holding a vote on the issue if he were elected prime minister.
The current law has also been challenged in the courts, with several people with terminal and life-limiting illnesses arguing for their right to die.
Both the BMA and Royal College of Nursing have neutral positions on assisted dying.
Others argue the current legal position around all forms of assisted death should remain the same.
Baroness Grey-Thompson is concerned that vulnerable people could be coerced into pursuing assisted dying, and that it is hard to put adequate safeguards in place.
"We need to make sure people are protected," she told BBC Breakfast, arguing that medical complications can arise once lethal drugs enter the body.
Dr Gordon Macdonald, of anti-assisted dying campaign group Care Not Killing, said he believed there were "many problems" with changing the law.
He is worried that criteria for assisted dying could in time be extended beyond terminally-ill people to include those with disabilities, and conditions such as dementia and depression.
The Dignity in Dying campaign group says more than 200 million people around the world have legal access to some form of assisted dying.
Switzerland has allowed assisted suicide since 1942. Its Dignitas facility began operating in 1998. However, all forms of euthanasia are against the law.
Assisted suicide is also legal in neighbouring Austria.
In the US,11 states allow assisted dying. Known as "physician-assisted dying", it permits doctors to prescribe lethal drugs for self-administration.
Physician-assisted dying is legal in Oregon, California, New Mexico, Colorado, Washington, Hawaii, New Jersey, Vermont, Maine and Washington DC.
In Montana, court rulings allow doctors to defend themselves if they assist in a person's suicide.
Voluntary euthanasia is legal in Canada, where it is called medical assistance in dying. It can be provided by a doctor or nurse practitioner, either in in person, or through the prescription of drugs for self-administration.
It is also legal in Spain and Colombia, both of which also permit assisted suicide.
Assisted dying is legal in some parts of Australia, but the law differs across states. It is not permitted in either the Northern or Australian Capital territories, which have separate legal systems.
New Zealand's End of Life Choice Act legalises assisted dying and allows adults in their final months of life to request assistance from a medical professional.
Three countries have laws that allow people who are not terminally ill to receive assistance to die: The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.